Public Historian. Archivist. Tea Drinker.
As part of my eCampus Ontario Open Education Fellows project I’ve had the opportunity to collaborate with Skylee-Storm Hogan on a couple of projects. As always, this collaboration has been a joy and I’ve learned so much from work with Skylee-Storm.
Part of this work has included creating a video that explores the intersection of Indigenous knowledge and OER. I’ve shared the video below and if you’re interested you can also checkout our slides and notes here.
My latest post, “Open Access Week and Publishing in the Open” can be read over at ActiveHistory.ca. This book looks at open scholarly publishing in Canada, my personal publishing ethics, and how to make your research more accessible.
In this episode I discuss the recent conclusion of the “Healing and Education Through Digital Access” project undertaken by the Shingwauk Residential Schools Centre. I talk about community engagement, how not all information wants to be free, and online access.
I would love to hear about your experiences working with community to undertake a digitization project. Leave a comment or send me a message on Twitter.
Mentioned in this episode:
–Press release for the Digitized Shingwauk Letter Books
–Archival listing of Letter Books
–OCAP Principals
Tara Robertson, “Not All Information Wants to be Free: The Case Study of On Our Backs”
A huge thank you to my colleague Jenna Lemay who did much of the heavy lifting on this project and who was responsible for developing the metadata for the Letter Books.
Download or listen now:
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
I’ve been thinking a lot about the implications of where I publish my work, the accessibility of my work to community members, and open access. In today’s episode I talk about peer reviewed journals, popular publishing, and finding open access outlets.
I would love to hear your thoughts on the intersection of history, publishing, and open access initiatives. Leave a comment or send me a message on Twitter.
Mentioned in this episode:
-“Doing the working: Editing Wikipedia as act of reconciliation.”
–Outrage over University’s $999 online textbook
-Thomas Peace, “Open Pedagogy: The Time is Now”
Download or listen now.
If you follow me on Twitter you know I’ve been thinking a lot about the implications of paywalls on community engaged research. My recent article, “Archival photographs in perspective: Indian residential school images of health” that is now out in the British Journal of Canadian Studies (volume 30, issue 2) is currently behind a paywall. So is every other article in this journal issue. At least one other author has spoken out about the problematic nature of pay-walling this content.
During the publication process I did manage to negotiate a shorter OA embargo period for this article – I’m extremely happy about this and very glad I took the time (and built up the internal courage) to ask about the possibilities. However, the more I think about my work and the community focused nature of it the more I’m questioning the need for it to be available to community based folks.
It was completely my decision to publish in this special issue and not having asking about the OA conditions prior to writing the article is totally on my shoulders. I agreed to write this article 3-4 years ago, which speaks volumes to the lengthy nature of the academic publishing cycle but also on how my opinions around community research have developed in that time. This experience has been a good reminder to me about the importance of knowing all the details of a journal before submitting. It has also made me take a serious look at my publishing goals and reconsider where I’m looking to publish in the future.
If I am engaged in community based work – especially work that is with a marginalized community – that work should be immediately accessible to the community I’m writing about. In a time where archives, public history professionals, and post-secondary institutions are talking more and more about decolonization we need to take a serious look at making our work accessible to the Indigenous communities we are working with. People working outside of the academy should not be placed on a second tier and should have the same access to information as everyone else.
In terms of learning more I would point folks toward to the First Nation principals of OCAP when thinking about information relating to Indigenous communities. OCAP speaks to the Ownership, Control, Access and Possession of information and data relating to Indigenous communities. I would also encourage people to reread the TRC Calls to Action around research and heritage and familiarize themselves with UNDRIP principles which relate to their work.
There are also a ton of fantastic folks doing work on OA publishing and promoting OA within the library, archives, and public history fields. If you’re looking for additional reading or information I’d suggest:
