As I mentioned earlier, I am very happy to be co-hosting the “Weikipedia As Outreach And Activism For Canadian History” with Jessica Knapp of Canada’s History Society. Last week we ran our first webinar which featured Jade Pichette, Skylee-Storm Hogan, and Ezra Winton discussing their experiences editing Wikipedia, hosting edit-a-thons, and sharing advice for those wanting to host or participate in future edit-a-thons. A recording of the webinar is available below.
Our next webinar is Wednesday July 19, 2017 at 2pm ET and will feature Amy Marshall Furness, the Rosamond Ivey Special Collections Archivist and Head, Library & Archives at the E.P. Taylor Research Library & Archives, Art Gallery of Ontario. Amy will be discussing her involvement with the Art+Feminism editing community and how to use Wikipedia for outreach and activism in a GLAM setting. Interested in joining us? You can register at: http://www.canadashistory.ca/Explore/Webinars/Wikipedia-as-Outreach-and-Activism-for-Canadian-History-Webinar-Series
Recently while I was visiting Grand Rapids, Michigan and had an opportunity to spend time exploring the Frederik Meijer Sculpture Park and Gardens. It was a wonderful few hours on a gorgeous summer day and I loved the mixture of art, nature, and cultivated gardens. The Gardens opened in 1995, sits on 158 acres and aims to promote an understanding of gardens, sculpture, nature, and the arts.
Given that the site is 158 acres and that we had a limited time frame we were selective about which areas of the Gardens we explored. We spent the bulk of our time exploring the Sculpture Park which is 30 acres of outdoor paths, formal gardens, and natural landscape all geared to showcase large outdoor sculptures. There was a mixture of modern and traditional sculpture with some of my favourites being huge metal sculptures that were large enough to walk under. I also liked that they intentionally left some areas of the sculpture park ‘wild’ or more natural, it provided a great contrast to the sculptures.
In addition to the sculpture park during our visit there was also an indoor exhibition, Ai Weiwei at Meiher Gardens: Natural State. As part of this show Ai Weiwei’s work was in a formal gallery space but also located in conservatories and public spaces. Ai Weiwei is known as an activist and artist and much of his work on display was politically motivated or providing critical commentary on social events.
We also spent some time viewing around the indoor conservatories, the British style outdoor garden area, and the kids garden. We concluded our visiting the daylily show and competition that just happened to be occurring the day we visited. Lilies are one of my favourite flowers and I adored seeing the range of colours and styles of flowers featured in the show.
Overall this was a really great way to spend a morning, I left feeling like I learned something and also feeling really relaxed after spending so much time outside among beautiful garden spaces. I would definitely recommend this site to anyone traveling through Grand Rapids.
Rosethal argues that “queer public history projects can utilize cities as living laboratories for the exploration of the queer past” (p. 43). When discussing the history of urban environments and marginalized communities looking at places of past activism, past conflict, past meeting/social connection venues can be hugely powerful. Similarly community experiences of erasure of flourishing can frequently be tied to physical spaces. Rosethal uses the examples of the Make Roanoke Queer Again bar crawl and the Southwest Virginia LGBTQ+ History Project of examples of community history rooted in collecting, preserving, and sharing queer histories.
I loved this article’s emphasis on the idea of queer history being connected to physical spaces, geographic places, and as a lived history. In many communities queer history has gone undocumented and at times is seen as non-existent or as irrelevant. Grassroots activism and community based history initiatives are one of the many ways to document queer pasts and realities – and I think that acknowledging the diversity of queer* experiences and histories is something that is hugely important when creating local history narratives. Rosethal’s article is well worth the read if you’re at all interested in community based public history or queer history interpretation projects.
For the past few years I’ve reflected on my professional practice and accomplishments at the end of the year. I’m going to continue that tradition with this blog post albeit in a slightly more list based format than the reflective posts I’ve done in the past.
In March I spoke as part of a “Finding the Embedded Archivist” panel at the National Council for Public History annual meeting in Baltimore, MD.
This year I provided instructional programming to over 1,250 people. The bulk of these instruction sessions related to residential schools, the history of the Shingwauk Indian Residential School, and reconciliation. However a handful were also related to teaching about archives and archival literacy.
As part of this work I’ve taken a serious look at how I present residential school history and revamped my instruction practices to make sure I’m giving priority to Indigenous voices.
I was appointed as the co-chair of the membership committee for the National Council on Public History
In August I was appointed to the Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives (SCCA) – Response to the Report on the Truth and Reconciliation Task Force. I am really honoured to be part of this committee and engaged in this important work relating to Indigenous communities and archives.
I started seriously editing Wikipedia. This was a bit of a rabbit hole for me – it initially started as a way to expand some of the archival outreach I do and evolved into a hobbie and something I really enjoy. I also organized a small edit-a-thon at Algoma University geared toward increasing content relating to Indigenous women on Wikipedia.
I curated and co-curated a number of smaller scale exhibitions on campus including one about local author Brian Vallée, and one focusing on Indigenous Women Activists and the Water Walk movement.
I setup and have been maintaining social media accounts for the Shingwauk Residential Schools Centre. I also learned a bit more about different tools to help schedule and manage this outreach work.
Self-Care and Other Priorities
I kept with my commitment to make my physical health a priority. I’ve been consistent in going to the gym on a regular basis and have been trying to eat better.
After much years of debate my partner and I made a decision to move. We’ve bought and house and will be moving in 2017. This move will mean I’m much closer to my work, it will cut down my commute significantly, and result in me getting to spend more time with my daughter.
I’ve been meeting regularly as part of two writing groups – an academic one (online) and a non-fiction group. Both of these have been key in keeping me motivated on some ongoing projects.
In November I was honured to stand beside my sister as during her wedding.
I’m raising a funny, energy filled 2 year old who can identify Doctor Who on my t-shirts and who loves playing tea time.
At the end of 2016 I am very grateful for great colleagues, a community of public historians who energize and inspire, and challenging conversations. Onward.
Recently a couple of projects I’m part of have been trying out collaborative digital workspaces for communicating with large groups, sharing documents, and scheduling. In both cases the desire is to streamline communication, avoid excessively long email chains, and facilitate collaborative digital projects. The two platforms I’ve been using are Slack and Basecamp.
Branded as a communication tool for teams, Slack allows groups to organize conversations using ‘channels.’ Channels are ways to categorize discussion based on project, team, topic etc and can be created to suit your group’s needs. You can also use Slack as a file sharing tool and it integrates with Google Drive and Dropbox. Similarly you can sync an existing Google Calendar into the slack interface.
Slack is available as a desktop program or as an app. I’m still new to this product and the slack ‘team’ I’m part of is still working on how Slack might fit into our workflow. I do like the mobile app and the way you can customize notifications based on your preferences. We’re only using the free version, so there is a limit to the number of messages that are searchable (10K) and file storage is limited to 5GB. But as a communication cool even the free version seems to be fairly agile and good at aggregating conversations. It also has hashtag functionality to help facilitate after the fact searching and navigation.
Basecamp is a more robust digital tool than Slack. It is a project management and collaborative workspace than simply a communication tool. Similar to Slack it’s available as a desktop and as a mobile app. The pricing model for Basecamp is slightly more aggressive than Slack, the first Basecamp you setup with an account is free but beyond that is $29/month. Basecamp is simple to use and has a fairly clean interface that facilitates the creation of to-do lists, message boards, group chat spaces, the uploading and sharing of files, and scheduling. It has some basic reporting functionality an some search functions.
There have been some criticisms of Basecamp’s functionality as a project management tool – it doesn’t allow the assigning of tasks to multiple people and it doesn’t allow time tracking. Outside of those flaws I think Basecamp works well as a collaborative space. It’s been incredibly easy to share documents on and to facilitate conversations among a dozen people. I could see larger groups having difficulty keeping up with content on Basecamp – in my mind huge message chains on a message board are only marginally better to keep on top of then a lengthy email chain. Similar to Slack I like the app functionality of this particular platform which is easy to update and review while not physically at a computer.
What digital collaboration tools have you found useful in streamlining group workflows?
Andrea has been wonderfully consistent in posting new content and typically maintains a schedule of a new blog post on Tuesday and a Canadian history roundup post on Sunday which highlights other Canadian history content online.
I commend anyone who is able to maintain that type of schedule for numerous months and still come out with interesting and insightful content. I also love the name of her blog and the implications of exposing histories and parts of historical practice that are not commonly discussed.
The Hack Library School (HLS) blog recently included a post titled “How to Librarians Learn to Teach?” The post looked at the challenges of being thrown into the librarian instruction fire and the lack of formal training many librarians (and archivists) have in teaching, despite the fact that many will probably run instruction sessions at some point in their careers. Last year HLS also featured a two part post by Liz McGlynn’s on “Instruction Instruction” which looked at learning about instruction while in library school and seeking out opportunities related to teaching and educational programming.
I’ve written about archival literacy before and both of these posts had me thinking about all the instruction and education based outreach work I do and how to create better learning experiences for new professionals. For the past number of years I’ve handled 75 to 100 educational groups a year. Often these groups are coming to learn about the history of the Shingwauk Residential School site and about residential schools more broadly. The style of each visit varies but generally includes a presentation, a walking tour, discussion, and maybe a hands-on activity or two depending on the length of visit and the age of the participations. I’ve done this style of programming for a whole range of groups: day camps, K-12 classes, post-secondary classes, professional organizations, and small family groups. This type of instruction is more public history/heritage site in style and is a bit out of the norm for most archival settings.
When I started there was no training process of learning how to conduct our standard walking tours – essentially you went along a number of them with a more experienced coworker and then were thrown into the fire to handle your own group. I still encourage new staff or student assistants to go on a number of tours before asking them to run their own. However I also often have them co-facilitate a couple of tours before handing over the reigns and I’ve also created a ‘tour cheat-sheet’ that has important dates and talking points that they can use while they are still learning. We also now have a more formal walking tour companion handout that staff and visitors can use to guide them around the site.
The other type of instruction I do occasionally is more standard archival literacy based instruction and focuses on teaching about our collections, accessing archival materials, and what archives actually are. These sessions tend to be very syllabus driven and are often shaped based on faculty collaboration. This type of archival/special collections instruction can be very case specific but having some type of documentation about your process can be a huge boon for future coworkers and provide institutional consistency to programming.
I’ve also been working the past couple of years to develop a small teaching collection that can be pulled out when classes visit. The collection is made up of duplicates and de-accessioned material and can be passed around without fear of damage. I often pull a couple of boxes of relevant material to the class as well but I’ve found it’s nice to have a prepackaged toolkit of material that has lots of different formats and is in varying states of preservation to use as examples, without having to lug up a mountain of different boxes.
I really enjoy the instruction and educational outreach part of my job. It can be exhausting – every time I have a group of particularly energetic school children I am very glad I didn’t go into teaching – but the rewards are well worth the effort.
I’ve been thinking a lot about service expectations, professional development opportunities and privilege. A lot has been written on the connection of conference attendance and privilege, conferences are expensive to attend and in the academic world that you often essentially pay to present your research. If you’re lucky enough to have a job that includes a professional development fund your travel and attendance might be covered but for many individuals these expenses come out of pocket. I’m very lucky (and privileged) to work in a place that has consistently supported my participation in conferences. I also have the time and financial stability to be able to attend professional development events and serve on professional committees without putting myself at financial risk.
I still think conferences can be valuable and have the potential to offer opportunities for connections with colleagues and skill building. I really look forward to the NCPH annual conference for this very reason and I have been on the organizing committee of a handful of conferences. However there definitely needs to be a more open dialogue about the financial challenges associated with attendance that is faced by students, early career professionals, and those in positions of precarious employment. In the academic world there is a huge sense of urgency that you need to build your CV by presenting at conferences but the very people who most need to build their CV through conference presentations are the ones who can least afford it. This sense of urgency is perhaps not a potent in the Canadian archives and library field but it is definitely still there – especially if you want to open career possibilities.
It’s important for conference organizers to think about what financial barriers their registration fees, hotel choices, and funding options place on attendance. Room sharing, attending smaller regional conferences, and other creative cost saving approaches can help on an individual level. As someone who lives in a region that rarely holds conferences related to my profession I understand the very real expenses associated with traveling for professional development. But this is a discussion we need to be having on a larger scale and is something we need to consider when running events. Creating opportunities for digital professional development, informal networking meetups, or running shorter less expensive single day events is one way to help with this. Similarly, joining planning committees and organizational committees where you can bring concerns and alternative suggestions can help.
Conferences are expensive to run, I get that. But there also needs to be a way that we can acknowledge the implicit privilege of conference attendance and work to create more inclusive spaces. This is particularly important for public historians and heritage professionals who work with communities and want to cultivate more community involvement. If we want to build meaningful collaboration and diversify our profession we need to create spaces for that to happen.
Following a great trip to Pukaskwa National Park I kept up the natural history and camping adventure by spending a few nights at Neys Provincial Park. I was struck by the difference in landscape between the two parks despite them being less than an hour away from each other. Pukaskwa had very hilly, cliff views of Lake Superior and the shoreline was a rugged . In comparison Ney’s had long open beach shorelines, sand dunes, and forested areas.
Prisoner of War Camp
Prior to becoming a provincial park the land now encompassed by Neys was used as a Prisoner of War Camp known as Neys 100 during the second world war. The camp housed high ranking German officers and others and was primarily staffed by veterans from the First World War. There are bits of this history scattered throughout the present day park — building foundations, bits of embed stone, and other physical remnants are all interpretation points in the Park today. Additionally the physical landscape was fundamentally changed by the POW camp, they flattened sand dunes and used many of the trees for lumber. Trees were later replanted by the Boy Scouts but in standard plantation rows, leaving evidence of how the land has changed.
We didn’t do nearly as much hiking at Neys as at Pukaskwa, but I did manage to explore a couple of the trails. The Point Trail is a short 1 km trail that follows the shore of Lake Superior and ends at a rocky outcrop known as Prisoners’ Point. The trail then connects to the Under the Volcano Trail that explores the shoreline stretching from the Point. I explored a bit of this trail as well. The trail was a relatively easy walk, albeit a bit wet when I walked it and it was well worth the puddle jumping to reach the views of the lake at the end. There was a few interpretive signs but they were relatively sparse. I did enjoy the one that talked about the remains of old boats located on the point– the boats were left over from the Prisoner of War camp era and the logging days of the region.
This easy loop hike included an interpretive handout that visitors could take with them on the walk. The handout included numbers which matched specific points on the trail and provided interpretive details about that area. The handout included a bit of information about the role of the POW camp on the landscape but primarily focused on flowers, the dunes, trees, and the impact of local animal life on the landscape. Unsurprisingly, I liked the fact that there was a physical thing to hold during the walk and that the interpretation was a bit more developed on this trail.
The Visitors’ Centre was only open during the last day I was at the park. Despite this we managed to make a short visit to the Centre and check out some their primary interpretive space. The displays were fairly standard for a provincial park, a lot of focus on the natural landscape with most material geared at families and including a number of touch and feel stations focused on children. There was also a substantial section dedicated to the history of Neys 100 which included a model which demonstrated what the POW camp would have looked like. The staff at the Centre were very friendly and seemed to know a lot about the history of the Park and were happy to answer questions about the way the landscape had changed.
Recently I visited Pukaskwa National Park, the only wilderness national Park in Ontario. The Park features a small campground and 1878 square km of wonderful Northern Ontario natural heritage.
I had a wonderful time camping, exploring, and learning about the landscape at Pukaskwa. We were there prior to the official start of their interpretation season (July and August) but still managed to take in some activities and many of their trails have great interpretive signage that can be used without a guide.
Anishinaabe Camp Construction
The first morning at Pukaskwa we joined in a walk to the Anishinaabe Camp that was currently under construction. We were the only ones to participate in the walk that morning but it was worth the half hour to talk with the people building an interpretive space based on traditional knowledge. Our guide was from Pic River First Nation and works as at the park as a cultural interpreter and programmer and the builders were a combination of local and visiting people with knowledge of traditional structures. As an added bonus our guide took us into the Visitor Centre despite it not being officially open for the season so we could take a look at some of their other programming spaces and some of the other birch bark items that were made at the Park. I loved that the park integrates traditional knowledge keepers into interpretive programming.
Pukaskwa has a number of short hikes that can all be completed in a hour or two from the campground. This was perfect for us given that we were traveling with a small child. The first hike we did was the “Beach Trail” which visits driftwood filled beaches in three different areas of shoreline – Horseshoe Bay, middle beach, and north beach. The views of Lake Superior and the huge amounts of driftwood were amazing to look at. This trail was a fairly easy hike though there were a few spots that could have used better signage and required some hunting to pick up the trail again. In addition to the natural beauty Horseshoe Bay also featured an easel which explored the Group of Seven’s paintings inspired by the landscape contained in Pukaskwa. I loved this integration of history, culture, and natural heritage.
The second trail we explored was the Bimose Kinoomagewnan trail or the “Walk of Teachings”. This trail may have been my favourite of the many hikes we did at Pukaskwa. It didn’t have Lake Superior views but the views around Halfway Lake and the interpretive signage focusing on the Seven Grandfather Teachings was extremely well done.
Each teaching had a sign placed at scenic points on the trail and the signage contained stories of Elders’ experiences in the park, their thoughts on the teachings, and their memories of the land. Each of these written experiences was paired with artwork by local youth. The signage was in three languages (English, French, Ojibway) and extremely well done and added to the trail significantly. On the natural heritage side of things I loved the variety of this trail which includes forested land, huge rock faces, hills, a beaver lodge, and fantastic views.
Southern Headland Trail
This was probably the most popular trail we explored – at least judging by the number of people we saw exploring the views. On many of the other hikes we didn’t see anyone else. The Southern Headland trail has breath taking Lake Superior views and overlooks Hattie Cove, Pulpwood Harbour, and Horseshoe Bay.
This walk provides visitors with glimpses of the power of Superior and there is some signage talking about the impact the lake has on the landscape and flora/fauna in the region. This trail also featured the “red chair experience” a Parks Canada national initiative which places red Muskoka style chairs at places with breathtaking views and spots which highlight some of the best spots in national parks. I love the idea of making destination points within parks that are points of connection, shared experience, and social media opportunities.
Also known as “the Spirit Trail”, Manito Miikana is a predominately forested trail leading to two viewing platforms with panoramic views of Lake Superior. This was by far the most difficult trail we hiked, it has a lot of changing elevations, a ton of tree roots, uneven ground, and it was very wet the day we walked it. The views were similar to that of the Southern Headland Trail but overlooked different portions of the lake and also allowed for a look at the Pic River Dunes in the distance. It wasn’t a bad hike and we probably would have enjoyed it more if it hadn’t rained so much prior to our walk.
I really enjoyed Pukaskwa National Park, exploring the natural history and learning a bit more about the landscape of the North Shore. I was also pleasantly surprised by a lot of the interpretation programming and signage in the park. The interpretation I engaged with was really well done and the Park has made an effort to engage local Indigenous communities in programming and include traditional knowledge in their signage.